Legal Opinion

Hart v. W.H. Stewart, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 18, 1989No. 51 W.D. Appeal Dkt. 1988PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

NIX, Chief Justice.

This products liability action presents the question whether the trial court violated the collateral source rule by allowing evidence of workmen’s compensation payments received by the plaintiff during the period of his incapacity. The pertinent facts are as follows.

*15Appellee, John Hart, was injured while operating a pipe-cleaning machine manufactured by appellant, W.H. Stewart (“Stewart”). Appellee filed suit against Stewart, alleging that the machine was defectively designed and that Stewart had negligently failed to provide…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Downey v. WestonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Nebel v. MAUKSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Kitchen v. Grampian BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Miller v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. VenturaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Johnson v. Hyundai Motor AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Schmidt v. Boardman Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Wilson v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Trude v. MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API