Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Williams

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 22, 1998No. 0008 E.D. Appeal Docket 1997PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

NEWMAN, Justice.

In this appeal, we must decide whether the Superior Court erred when it affirmed Gary Williams’ (Williams) judgment of sentence for controlled substance offenses because he did not provide the Superior Court with the complete trial court record from his case. Because the circumstances preventing timely transmission of the record are unclear, we reverse the Order of the Superior Court and remand this case to that court with instructions to remand this matter to the Court of Common Pleas for an evidentiary hearing.

Facts and Procedural History

On April 25,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Dorn v. Stanhope Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. PrestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. SneedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. PowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Parr, J. v. Ford Motor CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API