Legal Opinion

Fairbanks North Star Borough v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1992No. S-4345PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This appeal arises from an action filed by the Fairbanks North Star Borough (FNSB) against the State of Alaska for trespass, inverse condemnation, quiet title, ejectment, and rescission and restitution. The superior court held that, to the extent that FNSB’s action turned upon a review of matters that were raised or could have been raised in a prior administrative hearing, the action was barred as an untimely appeal of an administrative determination. The superior court also held that the rescission and restitution claims were barred by the six-year…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. RutherfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. Lundgren Pacific Const. Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Owsichek v. State, Guide Licensing & Control BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Winegardner v. Greater Anchorage Area BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. White v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Yost v. State, Division of Corporations, Business & Professional LicensingAlaska Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API