Legal Opinion
Cardoso v. Calbone
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 18, 2007No. 06-6266PublishedCited by 177 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Rogelio Cardoso, an Oklahoma inmate proceeding pro se here as in the district court, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants on his claims that they violated his constitutional rights. He filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that defendants abridged his due-process rights when they reduced his security-classification level from four to two, which adversely affected the rate at which he could earn credits against his sentence. In addition, he seeks damages for defendants’ violation of his rights in a disciplinary…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Edwards v. BalisokSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by177 opinions
- Gee v. PachecoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- McCoy v. MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Couch v. JabeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Mountain Highlands, LLC v. HendricksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- SEC v. GenAudio Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
172 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.