Legal Opinion
Morrow v. Shuff
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 23, 1929No. 6 Div. 308PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.
A single count declaring upon several promissory notes, arising out of the' same transaction, is good. Dade v. Bishop, Minor, 263; Bird v. Daniel, 9 Ala. 302; Woodall & Sons v. People’s Nat. Bank, 153 Ala. 576, 45 So. 194.
Plaintiff, appellee, insisted that the several promissory notes in suit which had been executed by one Cook and made payable to .defendant had been indorsed by defendant to him in payment for his (plaintiff’s) half interest in a stock of goods and a mercantile business at Parrish in Walker county. Defendant insisted that he and plaintiff, owners in common of the business and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Woodall & Sons v. People's National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Stone v. GoldbergAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
- Bickart v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Bird v. DanielSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
- Brown v. First National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lehigh Portland Cement Co. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Kessler v. PeckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Lehigh Portland Cement Co. v. CampbellAlabama Court of Appeals · 1936
- Brasher v. BrombergSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Carns v. Commonwealth Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1936