Legal Opinion
Brasher v. Bromberg
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 28, 1936No. 6 Div. 820PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSONj Chief Justice.
This suit is based upon one count seeking to recover of the defendant as an indorser of a certain note therein described. The complaint did not charge notice of default of the principal or an excuse for a failure to give same. It was necessary in order to state an action against this defendant indorser to allege the condition of his liability or a legal excuse for the nonobservance. Falkner v. Protective Life Ins. Co., 228 Ala. 57, 152 So. 34; Copeland v. Keller, 221 Ala. 533, 129 So. 571. The complaint was subject to the defendant’s demurrer.
It is suggested by counsel…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Little v. People's BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Navco Hardwood Co. v. BassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Staples v. City Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Falkner v. Protective Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Hardegree v. RileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bank of Loretto v. BoboAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
- Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. DeeseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Milwaukee Mechanics Ins. Co. v. MaplesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
- Milwaukee Mechanics Ins. Co. v. MaplesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953