Legal Opinion

Lehigh Portland Cement Co. v. Donaldson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 17, 1935No. 6 Div. 783PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is an action at law for the recovery of damages claimed for negligence in blasting limestone by defendant on its own property, thereby injuring the adjoining property of plaintiff’s intestate, and also his person.

The first assignment of error relates to the giving of charge No. 7 for the plaintiff. The objection urged is that it uses the words “through the negligent use of dynamite,” as though “through” were equivalent to “proximate cause.” It is observed that the charge is first predicated on the assumption that the jury should find for plaintiff. That apparently means…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bessemer Coal, Iron & Land Co. v. DoakSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  2. Atlanta & Birmingham A. L. Ry. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  3. Brinkmeyer v. BetheaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  4. Johnson v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Ridgely Operating Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. American Mut. Liability Ins. Co. v. Agricola FurnaceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. Moon v. Harco Drugs, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. City of Bessemer v. ClowdusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  5. Arrick v. FanningAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API