Legal Opinion

State v. Shelman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 5, 2003No. COA02-1261PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVINSON, Judge.

Defendant (David Shelman) appeals from conviction of trafficking in methamphetamine by possession and by transportation. We conclude the defendant had a fair trial, free of prejudicial error.

The State’s evidence tended to show, in relevant part, the following: U.S. Postal Inspector Charles Thompson testified that he was assigned to narcotics investigations and that in April, 2001, he was informed by postal inspectors from Indianapolis, Indiana, that a package of methamphetamine had been intercepted in Indianapolis. The box of methamphetamine was shipped to Inspector Thompson…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. State v. BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. State v. CallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Thomas v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. RobledoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  4. State v. CardenasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API