State v. Shelman
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
LEVINSON, Judge.
Defendant (David Shelman) appeals from conviction of trafficking in methamphetamine by possession and by transportation. We conclude the defendant had a fair trial, free of prejudicial error.
The State’s evidence tended to show, in relevant part, the following: U.S. Postal Inspector Charles Thompson testified that he was assigned to narcotics investigations and that in April, 2001, he was informed by postal inspectors from Indianapolis, Indiana, that a package of methamphetamine had been intercepted in Indianapolis. The box of methamphetamine was shipped to Inspector Thompson…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State v. CallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Thomas v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. RobledoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- State v. CardenasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.