Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Kansas Bostwick Irrigation District No. 2

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 25, 1958No. 40,724PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hall, J.:

This is a condemnation appeal.

Both the landowner and the irrigation district appealed to the district court from the award of the appraisers. After a trial and verdict by the jury the irrigation district takes this appeal.

The appellant irrigation district makes nine specifications of error. Specification numbers 4, 5, 6, and 7 are divided into several parts. For our purposes here the following is sufficient.

“1. The trial court erred in sustaining objections to the District’s Statement to the jury, that it would show benefits resulting from…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Nicholas v. LathamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  2. Shively v. BurrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  3. Pulliam v. PulliamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  4. Hamilton v. BingerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  5. Palmer v. HelmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of RogersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  2. King v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. Matlock v. MatlockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  4. Clarkson v. MangrumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  5. Jones v. Kansas City Embalming & Casket Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API