Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Binger

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 25, 1947No. 36,754PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*417The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.:

This was an action to recover the balance claimed to be due on a real-estate contract. Defendant prevailed and plaintiff appeals.

Material portions of the petition read:

“2. On or about September 8, 1945, the plaintiff and defendant entered into a written contract, a full, true and correct copy of which is hereto attached marked Exhibit ‘A’ and made a part hereof.
“3. Plaintiff has fully complied with her part of said contract and has heretofore furnished and delivered to the-defendant an abstract of title showing marketable title to the real…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Biby v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  2. Palmer v. HelmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  3. Brewer v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. City of Wichita v. BolesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  5. Heniff v. ClausenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Browning v. LefevreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  2. Darby v. KeeranSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. In Re Estate of WeidmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. Dupont v. Lotus Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  5. Smith v. Kansas Transport Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API