Legal Opinion

Jarkieh v. Badagliacco

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 1946No. Civ. No. 13013PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

The plaintiff and defendant are brother and sister, being the children of Anna Jarkieh, now deceased. Plaintiff brought this action to establish a one-half interest in certain bank accounts which were in the names of defendant and Anna at the time of Anna’s death. The jury decided in favor of plaintiff, and from the judgment entered on the verdicts the defendant appeals.

The theory of the first amended complaint, and the theory upon which the case was tried, is that although the legal titles *507to the bank deposits are in defendant, she holds a one-half interest therein in trust for plaintiff.

The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Moskowitz v. MarrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Andrews v. California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Marrow v. MoskowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Wallace v. RileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Williams v. HasshagenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Tenzer v. Superscope, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Boyd v. BevilacquaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Tranchina v. ArcinasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Winsor v. PowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  5. Girard v. BallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API