Chappel v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
The indictment contained three counts: the first charges forgery; second, passing as true a forged in strument, and, third, knowingly having in possession the false instrument described, etc. The court submitted to the jury only the second count, to wit: passing the forged instrument. The charging part of this count is as follows: That “James Chappel did unlawfully, wilfully and fraudulently utter and pass as true to Otto Paschel a certain false and forged instrument in writing, the tenor thereof is as follows, to wit: Bartlett, Tex. (meaning thereby Bartlett,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Daud v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Shannon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Simms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
- Womble v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Baysinger v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ritter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Chappell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910