Legal Opinion

Womble v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 8, 1898No. 1605PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Defendant made a motion to quash the indictment, which was overruled. No statement necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of attempting to pass as true an alleged forged instrument in writing, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of two years, and he prosecutes this appeal.

Motion was made to quash the indictment in the court below, on the ground: “First, because it charges no offense against the statute; second, the same is insufficient, because it does not allege that said false instrument would have incurred, diminished, discharged, or defeated any pecuniary obligation, or in any manner have affected any property whatever; third, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Daud v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  2. Shannon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Simms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
  4. Baysinger v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  5. State v. WheelerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Crawford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  2. Ritter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Forcy, Alias Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. Lynch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  5. Huckaby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API