Ritter v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
PRENDERGAST, Presiding Judge.
The appeal in this case is from a conviction under an indictment in two counts,—the first charging forgery, the other for knowingly having a forged instrument in his possession with intent to use and pass it.
The indictment is unusually lengthy. It occurs to us that it will be proper, if not necessary, to give the substance of the indictment, which we will endeavor to do without copying it literally. After the necessary usual allegations of the beginning, it avers:
That on October 8, 1914, and for years prior thereto and continuously since then, the International &…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cagle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Gentry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Messer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
- Feeny v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brasfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- State v. RosenbaumCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Tinker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
- State v. Miguel Martinez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2018
- Brasfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.