Legal Opinion

Nobles v. Memorial Hospital of Laramie County

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 2013No. S-12-0054PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Justice.

[11] In this medical malpractice case, the district court granted summary judgment against Appellant, Ted Nobles, and in favor of Appellees (Hospital), after determining that Mr. Nobles did not present his claim within the time specified in the applicable statute of limitations. Mr. Nobles appealed. We will reverse.

ISSUES

[12] The parties present three issues:

1. Whether the district court erred by failing to apply the continuous treatment rule?

2. Whether the single act exception to the continuous treatment rule is recognized in Wyoming, and if so, whether it applies in this case.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Metzger v. KalkeWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Metz Beverage Co. v. Wyoming Beverages, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stroth v. North Lincoln County Hospital DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Merry Candelaria v. Mahesh Karandikar, M.D.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  3. United States v. CaputoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
  4. Bret Vance v. Wyomed Laboratory, Inc. and Georgia L. CarmenWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Garret and Shelly Falkenburg v. Laramie Investment Company, Inc. and Brad M. JacksonWyoming Supreme Court · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API