Legal Opinion

Lahr v. Kraemer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 27, 1903No. Nos. 13,744 — (85)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Morrison county, Searle, J., denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, J.2

Action to recover for work, labor, and services performed by plaintiff for defendant, in which plaintiff had a verdict, and defendant appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The complaint alleges that between January 18, 1902, and April 13, 1902, plaintiff performed work, labor, and services for defendant at the agreed compensation of $40 per month, no part of which has ever been paid. The defense to the action was:

1. That at the time stated in the complaint defendant was engaged in the saloon business, and employed plaintiff as his bartender; that between February…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Steinbauer v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. Turner v. . KouwenhovenNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Peterson v. MayerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Raymond Farmers Elevator Co. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  2. Kramer v. Northwestern Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Hickey v. HickeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Physicians & Hospitals Supply Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  5. Brown v. Estate of FunckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API