Legal Opinion

Knudsen v. Moe Bros.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1911No. 9810PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Kitsap county, Yakey, J., entered March 17, 1911, in favor of the defendant, dismissing an action for personal injuries sustained through the fall of a log from a car, after a trial before the court and a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

Action by Louis Knudsen against Moe Brothers, Incorporated, a corporation, to recover damages for personal injuries. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, the defendant’s challenge to its sufficiency was sustained, and the action was dismissed. The plaintiff has appealed.

*119The only question presented is whether the trial judge erred in sustaining respondent’s challenge and dismissing the action. From the evidence the following facts appear: Respondent corporation is the owner of a logging camp, in Kit-sap county, together with a railroad, logging trucks, and machinery which it uses in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Withiam v. Tenino Stone QuarriesWashington Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Christiansen v. McLellanWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Knutson v. Moe Bros.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Cotton v. Morck Hotel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Williams v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Magnuson v. MacAdamWashington Supreme Court · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API