Legal Opinion

Leading Perfumers & Chemists, Inc. v. Nussbaum Novelty Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 18, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MANDELBAUM, District Judge.

The defendant moves for a dismissal of the action on the ground that this court has no jurisdiction over the defendant corporation.

The court must decide whether the defendant corporation was, at the time of the service of the summons, doing business within the state, and if it was so doing business, whether the person served with process was one of the persons designated by Section 229 of the Civil Practice Act.

From a reading of the affidavits and cases cited as well as an independent examination of the authorities, the court is of the belief that the defendant is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. W. S. Tyler Co. v. Ludlow-Saylor Wire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Davega, Inc. v. Lincoln Furniture Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carnegie v. Art Metal Construction Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API