Legal Opinion

Lussier v. Mau-Van Development, Inc. II

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided July 29, 1983No. 8429; CIVIL NO. 5364PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

TANAKA, J.

This shareholder’s derivative action is a sequel to a prior derivative case, Lussier v. Mau-Van Development, Inc., 4 Haw. App. 359, 667 P.2d 804 (1983) (hereinafter “Lussier I”), and involves the construction of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 416-35 (Supp. 1982). In this derivative case, plaintiff Marcel Lussier (Lussier) appeals from the judgment which dismissed his complaint with prejudice. We reverse.

Defendants Wilhelm Kainz (Kainz), Arnold Honigman (Honigman), and Curt Schlamann (Schlamann), together with Lussier, are the directors of defendant Mau-Van…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re the Tax Appeal of Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Waikiki Resort Hotel, Inc. v. City & County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Lussier v. Mau-Van Development, Inc. IHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Kawamoto v. YasutakeHawaii Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Life of the Land v. CITY COUNCIL, ETC.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sun-Times Media Group, Inc. v. BlackCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2008
  2. Foster Village Community Ass'n v. HessHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Kuhnert v. AllisonHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Armbruster v. NipHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. In Re the Claim of MaldonadoHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API