Legal Opinion

Apex Hosiery Co. v. Knitting Machines Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided April 20, 1950No. Civ. A. No. 1205PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODNEY, District Judge.

The question in the present case is whether a patentee, by the mere fact of bringing a patent infringement suit in Massachusetts against a user of machinery, has made such a threat or established such a controversy as to the patents involved in the machines as to enable another user of the same machines in a different district to maintain an action for a declaratory judgment as to the validity of the patents.

The defendant, Knitting Machines Corporation, a Delaware corporation, is the owner of five certain patents, termed the Miller patents, having to do with machines…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bruszewski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  2. Dewey & Almy Chemical Co. v. American Anode, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  3. Federal Telephone & Radio Corp. v. Associated Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  4. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Hughes Tool Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1945
  5. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Hughes Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith-Corona Marchant Inc. v. American Photocopy Equipment Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  2. Newell v. O. A. Newton & Son Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1950
  3. Central Hide & Rendering Co. v. B-M-K Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API