Legal Opinion

Purdue v. Ralph

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 22, 1938No. 8874PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

This is an action to recover the balance of the purchase price of a casinghead gasoline plant. The terms of sale provided that $5,000 should be paid in cash, $4,000 on February 16, 1930, and $4,000 on the sixteenth of each succeeding month until ten such payments had been made, plus a final payment of $3,000 one month later.

It was further agreed between the vendor and vendee that said deferred payments should be made only out of profits, and should bear interest at the rate of seven per cent per annum, and that, should the profits derived from the operation of the plant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eyster v. Centennial Board of FinanceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Boothe v. Summit Coal Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Mayer v. NethersoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  4. Union Theatre Co. v. Osran Amusement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Muhoberac v. Saloon, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API