Legal Opinion

Havel v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 28, 1957No. Civ. 22341PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDS, J. pro tem. *

Petitioner Clarence Havel, a former policeman, seeks by this writ of review to annul a decision after reconsideration made by the respondent Industrial Accident Commission determining that he did not sustain a compensable injury and annulment of its order denying his application for reconsideration.

Petitioner entered the employment of the city of Burbank as a police officer, under civil service, in 1941 and worked as a motorcycle and automobile patrol officer thereafter except for a short period in the military service. In about April, 1954, he began having a heavy…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Scott v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Fanning v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Simonton v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Wirz v. WirzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Foremost Dairies, Inc. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Bennett v. Durango Furniture Mart & Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  4. National Automobile & Casualty Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Ferris v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API