Legal Opinion

J & C Marketing, L.L.C. v. McGinty

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 2015No. 2013-1963PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.

{¶ 1} In this discretionary appeal from the Eighth District Court of Appeals, we consider whether information related to a criminal law-enforcement investigation is absolutely privileged against disclosure in a civil suit brought by the alleged target of the criminal investigation. Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney Timothy J. McGinty appeals from a judgment affirming in part the trial court’s order compelling him to produce in discovery in a civil action certain information related to a criminal law-enforcement investigation.

{¶ 2} We hold that the law-enforcement investigatory privilege is…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Federal Communications Commission v. American Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. In re The City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  4. Frankenhauser v. RizzoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Fred B. Black, Jr. v. Sheraton Corporation of America Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Ohio Dept. of Pub. Safety (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Nationwide Agribusiness Ins. Co. v. HeidlerOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Henry v. Warden, London Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
  4. Parra v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Ohio Dept. of Pub. Safety (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API