Legal Opinion

In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum Dated January 30, 1986

District Court, D. Maine

Decided June 19, 1986No. Misc. 85-00033-BPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

CYR, Chief Judge.

Movant, a psychiatrist and sole shareholder of a professional service corporation, seeks to quash subpoenas duces tecum 1 directed to the corporation and the custodian of the records of the corporation. As grounds for the motion to quash, movant asserts that the subpoenas (1) are unreasonable and oppressive; (2) command the production of materials protected by a psychotherapist-patient privilege; and (3) compel movant to perform an incriminatory testimonial act in violation of his fifth amendment privilege.

MERITS

A. Unreasonable and Oppressive

Movant…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Grant v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ChenetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  2. Commonwealth v. NeumyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  3. United States v. LoweDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
  4. Stark v. Hartt Transportation Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API