In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum Dated January 30, 1986
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
CYR, Chief Judge.
Movant, a psychiatrist and sole shareholder of a professional service corporation, seeks to quash subpoenas duces tecum 1 directed to the corporation and the custodian of the records of the corporation. As grounds for the motion to quash, movant asserts that the subpoenas (1) are unreasonable and oppressive; (2) command the production of materials protected by a psychotherapist-patient privilege; and (3) compel movant to perform an incriminatory testimonial act in violation of his fifth amendment privilege.
MERITS
A. Unreasonable and Oppressive
Movant…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Grant v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. ChenetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- Commonwealth v. NeumyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- United States v. LoweDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
- Stark v. Hartt Transportation Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2013