Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Neumyer

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 30, 2000PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The following submitted briefs for amici curiae:

1Opinion of the CourtCowin, J.

The defendant was charged in two indictments with rape and in a third indictment with indecent assault and battery on a person over the age of fourteen years.1 In preparing his defense, he sought certain records of the Boston Area Rape Crisis Center (BARCC). A Superior Court judge ordered BARCC to produce for the defendant a sanitized copy of its “hotline” records stating the time, date, and fact of a telephone communication between the victim and a rape counsellor. The judge concluded that these records were not privileged, but relevant, and thus discoverable pursuant to general discovery…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BishopMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  2. In Re Subpoena Served Upon Jorge S. Zuniga, M.D. In Re Subpoena Served Upon Gary R. Pierce, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. FullerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  4. Vanderbilt v. Town of ChilmarkDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
  5. Santelli v. Electro-MotiveDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LampronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. OliveiraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  3. Commonwealth v. Zane Z.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. PoitrasMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. CaceresMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API