Legal Opinion

Carden v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 9, 1945No. Appeals, 42-46PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Hobace Stebn,

The verdicts in these cases were for plaintiffs, bnt defendant moved the court below to enter judgments in its favor on the ground that plaintiffs were guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. The court refused the motion. Its action was proper because contributory negligence may be declared judicially only when so clearly revealed that fair and reasonable persons cannot disagree as to its existence, and here it was not so revealed.

In the pre-dawn darkness of a December morning the three plaintiffs were riding in a one-seat, three passenger,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kilpatrick v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Ehrisman v. East Harrisburg City Passenger Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  3. Landy v. RosensteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Smathers v. Pittsburg & Butler Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  5. Williams v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ashcraft v. C. G. Hussey and Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Pro v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Guca v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Fabel, Admr. v. HazlettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Keiser v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API