Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided January 10, 2008No. CIV-07-0121-FPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
STEPHEN P. FRIOT, District Judge.
Defendants’ motion to dismiss, filed September 24, 2007, is before the court. (Doc. no. 98.) The motion has been fully briefed and is ready for determination.
I. Background and Summary of Claims
The Second Amended Class Action Complaint (“SAC” or “the complaint,” doc. no. 91) is brought by three plaintiffs, Robert L. Thomas, Carolyn Ising and Jay Stout. These plaintiffs seek to bring class action claims on behalf of various subclasses of potential plaintiffs, although no class has been certified and no class issues are before the court at this time. All…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Goshen v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Thomas v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- In re HSBC Bank, USA, N.A., Debit Card Overdraft Fee LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- In re EpipenDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2018
- Childs v. UNIFIED LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2011
- Dinwiddie v. Suzuki Motor of America, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.