Legal Opinion
DeLeo v. Nusbaum
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided June 22, 2004No. File No. CV-96-0153309 SPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTierney, J.
This memorandum is the trial court’s decision from the remand of the Supreme Court: “The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings according to law.” DeLeo v. Nusbaum, 263 Conn. 588, 601, 821 A.2d 744 (2003).
I
FACTS
The court finds the following facts. The plaintiff, David DeLeo, brought this action against the defendants, Edward Nusbaum, an attorney, and the law firm of Nusbaum and Parrino, P.C., in which Nusbaum is a principal. The plaintiff claimed that the defendants had failed to represent him adequately in a dissolution action brought by his…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Miller v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Catz v. RubensteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Kelley v. BonneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Zapata v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Gagne v. VaccaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Deleo v. NusbaumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Cruz v. Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022