State Ex Rel. Anderson v. Haas
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.
Plaintiff, who has been indicted and is awaiting ial for a Class A felony, brought this mandamus roceeding to compel defendant, the Multnomah ounty District Attorney, to consider plaintiff for disrsion pursuant to ORS 135.881 et seq, as an altema-ve to prosecution at the present time. The altema-ve writ of mandamus alleges, in essence, that defend-it declined to consider plaintiff for diversion because is defendant’s policy or practice not to divert persons ho are charged with Class A felonies. Defendant imurred to the alternative writ on the grounds it did )t state sufficient facts to…
2Cited by12 opinions
- State v. GreenleeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- State v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. KramerDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.