Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Anderson v. Haas

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 8, 1979No. A 7908-03914, CA 15914PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

Plaintiff, who has been indicted and is awaiting ial for a Class A felony, brought this mandamus roceeding to compel defendant, the Multnomah ounty District Attorney, to consider plaintiff for disrsion pursuant to ORS 135.881 et seq, as an altema-ve to prosecution at the present time. The altema-ve writ of mandamus alleges, in essence, that defend-it declined to consider plaintiff for diversion because is defendant’s policy or practice not to divert persons ho are charged with Class A felonies. Defendant imurred to the alternative writ on the grounds it did )t state sufficient facts to…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. GreenleeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  2. State v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Government of the Virgin Islands v. KramerDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API