Government of the Virgin Islands v. Kramer
District Court, Virgin Islands
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
The issues in this appeal from the territorial court are twofold: whether the discretionary provisions of 5 V.I.C. § 4613 are unconstitutional per se and whether the assistant attorney general abused his discretion by denying the appellant permission to enter *319the Virgin Islands pretrial intervention program. We find § 4613 is constitutional and that the assistant attorney general did not abuse his discretion.
I. FACTS
On June 22,1984, the appellant, Paul E. Kramer (“Kramer”), was charged in the territorial court with possession of an unlicensed firearm and with…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Newman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Commonwealth v. LutzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. WexlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- United States v. Jerome T. BlandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. RosarioSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015