Legal Opinion

State v. Graves

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 21, 1982No. C 81-01-30059, CA A22470PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

Defendant was convicted of forgery in the first degree. He argues on appeal that the trial court erred by denying his motion for drug diversion pursuant to ORS 430.450 et seq and ORS 135.881 et seq. We affirm.

Prior to trial, defendant moved the court for drug diversion in lieu of prosecution. A hearing was held on the motion, at which time the district attorney informed the court that defendant did not qualify for diversion. The court denied the motion.

Defendant argues first that the diversion statutes confer upon drug-dependent defendants a right to choose treatment in lieu of prosecution.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Olsen v. State Ex Rel. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. City of Klamath Falls v. WintersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. EvansOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. EvansOregon Supreme Court · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People in Interest of RWVColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Billis v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Billis v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Heggen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API