Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ada County Highway District ex rel. Fairbanks v. Acarrequi

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1983No. 14249Published

1DissentBistline, Justice

I would affirm the judgment allowing attorney’s fees. The ruling of Judge Smith, a ruling which was long overdue in this area of the law, is highly commendable. Touching lightly upon the views of Justice Bakes, who would affirm on the technicality that the case was filed before March 1, 1979,1 I disagree with his view that I.C. § 12-121 is here applicable. Our opinion in Rueth v. State, 100 Idaho 203, 596 P.2d 75 (1979), made it clear that, in reaffirming Flandro v. Seddon, 94 Idaho 940, 500 P.2d 841 (1972), a condemnation proceeding is an action provided for by the Idaho Constitution, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Rueth v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State Ex Rel. Flandro v. SeddonIdaho Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API