Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,537 William M. Reid, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of Weatherby Engineering Co. v. H. D. Hughes
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FAY, Circuit Judge:
This appeal raises a variety of difficult questions under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Suing individually and derivatively, William M. Reid charged the defendants with a multitude of sins including violations of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the 1934 Act. 1 The district court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 2 The basis of the district court’s order was evidently a determination that the plaintiff had failed to allege in his complaint that either he or the company on whose behalf he brought…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,861 Gerald Mansbach v. Prescott, Ball & TurbenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,567 Edmond G. Pharo v. W. L. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,609 National Bank of Commerce of Dallas v. All American Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Edwin F. Gordon, Cross-Appellee v. E. G. Green, Gustave T. Broberg, Jr., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Pelletier v. Stuart-James Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.