Legal Opinion
Armand A. Mayer v. Arnold Ordman, as General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 29, 1968No. 18058PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Per curiam
This action is based upon the refusal of the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board to investigate certain charges of unfair labor practices. Averring that he was wrongfully discharged by his employer, plaintiff sought mandatory and declaratory relief to require the General Counsel to investigate.
District Judge Fred W. Kaess dismissed the action for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter for the reasons stated in his order which is made an appendix to this opinion.
This panel was appointed by the Chief Judge under Rule 3(5) of the rules of this Court to review the next…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc., Baltimore Metropolitan Chapter v. John R. Irving, General Counsel National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Josue N. Saez v. Eugene G. Goslee, as Acting General Counsel And/or Peter G. Nash, General Counsel of the National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
- Marvin Echols v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Jacqueline Tensing v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Rockford Redi-Mix Co. v. ZippCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.