Jacqueline Tensing v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
Petitioners seek review of the refusal of the NLRB’s General Counsel to issue a complaint on charges filed before the Board. The Board has moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
We have held previously that district courts may not review the refusal of the Board’s General Counsel to investigate or to file a complaint concerning unfair labor practice charges, Mayer v. Ordman, 391 F.2d 889 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 925, 89 S.Ct. 257, 21 L.Ed.2d 261 (1968), adhering to the teaching of Vaca v. Sipes, 386 U.S. 171, 182, 87 S.Ct. 903, 913, 17 L.Ed.2d 842 (1967), that “the Board’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Armand A. Mayer v. Arnold Ordman, as General Counsel of the National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Carmen Hernandez v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
3Cited by8 opinions
- Marvin Echols v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Rockford Redi-Mix Co. v. ZippCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Rockford Redi-Mix Co., Inc. v. ZippDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
- State v. Council of NJ State College LocalsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Baker v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees & Moving Picture OperatorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.