Legal Opinion

Manzo v. Ford

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 7, 1987No. C14-86-546-CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEARS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a take-nothing summary judgment granted in Appellants’ suit for breach of contract. We hold that the trial court erred in finding that: (1) the provisions of the contract barred Appellants from pursuing a cause of action based on breach of contract, and (2) that there was no material fact issue as to Ap-pellees’ liability. We reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the cause for trial.

On March 25, 1979, Appellants, residents of California, purchased an apartment complex in Houston, Texas, known as the High Chapparal Apartments. Appellees…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. R & P Enterprises v. LaGuarta, Gavrel & Kirk, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. City of Pinehurst v. Spooner Addition Water Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Citizens National Bank v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
  4. International Printing Pressmen & Assistants' Union v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Smart v. Tower Land & Investment Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cook Composites, Inc. v. Westlake Styrene Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  2. Terrill v. Tuckness, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  3. City of Austin v. Houston Lighting & Power Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  4. Derr Construction Co. v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. English v. BGP International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API