Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Gutfreund
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 26, 1985No. 82 Civ. 2394(MEL)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LASKER, District Judge.
This is the most recent of several motions to dismiss in this case. Defendants now move to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). In the alternative the defendants move for summary judgment. The motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1) is granted.
The facts giving rise to this action are set out in detail at 583 F.Supp. 957 (S.D.N. Y.1984). The suit arises out of the buyout of Salomon Brothers in 1981 by Phibro Corp. (“Phibro”). Vincent B. Murphy, until 1980 a Salomon Brothers general partner, alleges a breach…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Navarro Savings Assn. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Company v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Prescription Plan Service Corp. v. Albert Franco, Individually and as AdministratorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Harry Lewis v. Robert S. Odell, and Howard Butcher IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Schiavone Construction Co., Daidone Electric of New York, Inc., a Joint Venture v. City of New York, Red Hook Water Pollution Control PlantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- McCune & McCune v. Mountain Bell TelephoneUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- Baker v. Latham Sparrowbush AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Nelson & Small, Inc. v. Polaris Industries Partners, L.P.District Court, D. Maine · 1989
- Freeman v. Stake.comDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023