Kuharski v. Bristol Brass Corporation
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
This appeal from an award of compensation involves an injury on a highway adjacent to the place of employment. It is, in effect, an attack on the conclusions of the commissioner on the ground that they are not supported by the subordinate facts. The finding, as corrected by the Superior Court, may be summarized as follows: Broad Street is a heavily traveled road between Bristol and Plainville. The Bristol Brass Corporation, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, operates a plant situated on both the north and south sides of Broad Street, and its property is about one thousand feet in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Larke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Smith v. Seamless Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Merlino v. Connecticut Quarries Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
- Wilder v. Russell Library Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Taylor v. M. A. Gammino Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Chapman's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- McKiernan v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Katz v. KatzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Peters v. BRISTOL MANUFACTURING CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1962
- Cirrito v. Turner Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.