Legal Opinion
Katz v. Katz
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 18, 1950PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
This is an appeal by the defendant employer, hereinafter called the defendant, and his insurer from a judgment of the Superior Court sustaining a finding and award of the compensation commissioner in favor of the plaintiff. The plaintiff claims compensation for injuries sustained when he was hit by an automobile on the public highway as he was walking home from work in the defendant’s laundry. The question determinative of the appeal is whether the court was warranted in sustaining the commissioner’s conclusion that the plaintiff’s injury arose out of and in the course of his employment.
We…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Swanson v. LathamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
- Stakonis v. United Advertising CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Procaccino v. E. Horton & SonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Lake v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Sala v. American Sumatra Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- O'Brien v. First Camden National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Blaustein v. Mitre Corp.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2001
- Farnham v. LabutisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- McKiernan v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Kish v. Nursing & Home Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.