Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Johnson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 20, 1876PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Contract. The declaration contained five counts, and an amended count was subsequently filed. The defendant demurred. The case was reserved by Grray, C. J., on the declaration and demurrer, for the consideration of the full court, and appears in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtEndicott, J.

The facts of this case, as stated in the declaration and admitted by the demurrer, are as follows : The defendant’s testator and Richard C. Johnson were trustees, under the will of Richard Johnson, to pay over to the plaintiff in quarterly payments during his natural life one fourth part of the income of the estate of Richard Johnson. The trustees entered upon the execution of the trust, and upon the death of Richard C. Johnson the defendant’s testator continued as surviving trustee, until his own death in 1870. During the whole time, the defendant’s testator managed the trust estate and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gould v. EmersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Dias v. Brunell'sNew York Supreme Court · 1840

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Davis v. CoburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  2. Currier v. StudleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  3. Wickwire Spencer Steel Corp. v. United Spring Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Van Camp v. . SearleNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Chase v. PerleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API