Legal Opinion
Dart Transit Company v. Paccar, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 25, 2025No. 0:24-cv-03686Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Dart Transit Company, No. 24-cv-3686 (KMM/SGE) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Paccar, Inc., Paccar Engine Company, Kenworth Truck Company, and Peterbilt Motors Company, Defendants. Plaintiff Dart Transit Company (“Dart Transit”) filed this action asserting claims for breach of express warranty, breach of implied warranty, and for violations of the Minnesota Prevention of Consumer Fraud Act (“MCFA”) against Defendants Paccar, Inc., Paccar Engine Company, Kenworth Truck Company, and Peterbilt Motors Company. Defendants move to dismiss the Complaint for…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Drobnak v. Andersen Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Hoang Minh Ly v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.