Legal Opinion

Mahnich v. Southern S. S. Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 10, 1941No. 261PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

This is an action in admiralty for indemnity under the maritime law and for maintenance and cure, brought by a seaman injured at sea in the course of his employment on the respondent’s vessel, Wichita Falls. At the close of the trial the Court orally made certain fact findings, and awarded the libellant $700 on his claim for indemnity and $300 for cure and maintenance. The indemnity awarded was for pain and suffering only, all items *840of loss of wages and loss of earning power being disallowed.

The respondent has filed a petition for reargument, which may be treated…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Loverich v. Warner Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  3. Plamals v. S. S. "Pinar Del Rio"Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. The BirkenheadDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1930

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Luksich v. MisetichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
  2. Mahnich v. Southern Steamship Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  3. John A. Wounick v. Pittsburgh Consolidation Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  4. John A. Wounick v. Pittsburgh Consolidation Coal Company. No.13117Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  5. Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API