Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Dissent
Mr. Justice Frankfurter, whom Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Whittaker join,
dissenting.
No area of federal law is judge-made at its source to such an extent as is the law of admiralty. The evolution of judge-made law is a process of accretion and erosion. We are told by a great master that law is civilized to the *551extent that it is purposefully conscious. Conversely, if law just “grow’d” like Topsy, unreflectively and without conscious design, it is irrational. When it appears that a challenged doctrine has been uncritically accepted as a matter of course by the inertia of repetition — has…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Mahnich v. Southern Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.