Legal Opinion

Cheslock v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1949No. Appeal, 146PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

Margaret Cheslock sued the defendant company under the Wrongful Death Act for damages to herself, as widow, and on behalf of her two minor children for the death of her husband due to alleged negligence of the defendant. She also made claim in the same action, under the Survival Statute, as administratrix of her deceased husband’s estate. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Mrs. Cheslock and her children in the sum of $30,000, but, in favor of the defendant, as to the estate’s' claim. The defendant filed motions for a new trial and for judgment n. o. v. which…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ely v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis RailwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Frederick v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Anstine v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Mars v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Parker v. Matheson Motor Car Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Green v. Reading Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  2. Smith v. FlannerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Stephan Micromanolis v. The Woods School, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. Conry v. Baltimore & O. R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  5. Conry v. Baltimore & O. R.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API