Diversified Services, Inc. v. United States
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
DE VANE, District Judge.
The facts in these cases are not in dispute. They are fully disclosed by the pleadings and by the requests for admission of facts and documents and the answers thereto. The cases are pending before this Court on motions for summary judgments filed by the plaintiffs and the defendant.
Nature of Controversy
In each of the six above numbered actions (1023 to 1028 both inclusive) each corporation elected, pursuant to Section 392(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C.A. § 392(b), not to have taxed in 1954 the gains resulting from the sale of the properties of each…
2Cited by5 opinions
- J. C. Penney Company, Transferee v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- J. C. Penney Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
- J. C. Penney Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
- Lattimore v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
- United States v. Diversified Services, Inc., as Transferee and Successor of Dr. P. Phillips and Sons, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963