Legal Opinion

People v. Itehua

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 24, 2014No. B252472PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, P. J.

In People v. Butler (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 557 [88 Cal.Rptr.2d 210], the defendant was guilty of the crime of stalking because he threatened the victim with violence. (Pen. Code, § 646.9.) We held the defendant’s offense qualified him as a mentally disordered offender (MDO). (Butler, supra, 74 Cal.App.4th 557, 561; § 2962, subd. (e)(2)(Q).)

Here we hold that a defendant whose stalking offense involves implied threats of violence also meets the criteria of an MDO. Elias Itehua appeals a judgment committing him to the State Department of Mental Health (now known as State…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. OchoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People v. FalckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. People v. EwingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. People v. UeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. People v. ButlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. SANCHEZ-LOPEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2018
  3. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. People v. Magee CA5California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. People v. Neighbors CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API