People v. Itehua
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GILBERT, P. J.
In People v. Butler (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 557 [88 Cal.Rptr.2d 210], the defendant was guilty of the crime of stalking because he threatened the victim with violence. (Pen. Code, § 646.9.) We held the defendant’s offense qualified him as a mentally disordered offender (MDO). (Butler, supra, 74 Cal.App.4th 557, 561; § 2962, subd. (e)(2)(Q).)
Here we hold that a defendant whose stalking offense involves implied threats of violence also meets the criteria of an MDO. Elias Itehua appeals a judgment committing him to the State Department of Mental Health (now known as State…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. OchoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. FalckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- People v. EwingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- People v. UeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. ButlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- SANCHEZ-LOPEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2018
- People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. Magee CA5California Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. Neighbors CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.