People v. Falck
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEIN, J.
Appellant George F. Falck stands convicted of stalking, a violation of Penal Code section 646.9, subdivision (a). Appellant contends on appeal that the term “safety” set forth in the statute is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. He further raises issues of the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction [/]. * We reject the contention!/] * of unconstitutionality [/]. * We find that the evidence is sufficient to support appellant’s conviction[/], * and accordingly affirm the judgment.
Facts
Appellant has been diagnosed as suffering from schizophrenia. His ability…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Fernando Malta-Espinoza v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- People v. BorrelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. BambaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- People v. EwingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- People v. UeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.