Legal Opinion

Progressive Animal Welfare Society v. University of Washington

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 19, 1989No. 21517-5-IPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinsor, J.

The Progressive Animal Welfare Society (PAWS) appeals an award of attorney fees made in conjunction with its action against the University of Washington (University) for public disclosure law violations. The trial court awarded PAWS substantially less fees than it requested. We vacate the award and remand for reconsideration.

This action arises from PAWS' request for University forms describing the procedures, experimental design, and objectives of proposed animal research projects. The University, through a letter from John Coulter, essentially denied PAWS' request, but left the matter open…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  2. Bowers v. Transamerica Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Hearst Corp. v. HoppeWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Boeing Company v. Sierracin CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Holland v. Boeing CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Progressive Animal Welfare Society v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Absher Construction Co. v. Kent School District No. 415Court of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  3. Absher Const. Co. v. KENT SCHOOL DIST.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  4. Rhinehart v. Seattle Times, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  5. Taliesen Corp. v. Razore Land Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API