Legal Opinion

Young v. New Mexico Broadcasting Company

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1956No. 5992PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Chief Justice.

Appellants, defendants below, appeal from an adverse judgment awarding damages for libel. Plaintiff Young and appellee Davis were partners engaged in television repair service at Albuquerque under the trade name Day and Night Television Service Company. Davis was a silent partner in the company when the suit was brought by Young, but at his own request, was made a party plaintiff. Subsequently, Young assigned his interest in the company to Davis. The cause was then dismissed as to Young and carried on in the name of Davis.

They had been advertising regularly in the local…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Marr v. PutnamOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Kandelin v. Lee Moor Contracting Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Hedrick v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  4. Chandler v. BattenfieldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Snodgrass v. Turner Tourist Hotels, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Sims v. Kiro, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  2. Poorbaugh v. MullenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Reed v. MelnickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Hamilton v. DotyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Frank Bond & Son, Inc. v. Reserve Minerals Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1959

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API