Legal Opinion

Kandelin v. Lee Moor Contracting Co.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1933No. 3797PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BICKLEY, Justice.

Kandelin sued appellsint for damages occasioned by personal injuries due to the negligent operation by appellant of a truck on a New Mexico highway. Later, the Pacific Indemnity Company sued, in the same court, to recover sums of money that company as insurer of appellee’s employer paid to Kandelin under the compensation laws of California. Upon motion of defendant (appellant), the court consolidated said causes for all purposes including trial and appeal. At the opening of the trial, appellant asked permission to file an amended answer to appellee’s complaint. Its principal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. James v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  2. Moseley v. Lily Ice Cream Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Bernard v. JenningsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. National Union Fire Insurance v. Denver & R. G. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1913
  5. MacCarthy v. WhitcombWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Southern California Petroleum Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Transport Indemnity Company v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Brown v. Arapahoe Drilling CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Montoya v. Aral Security, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Herrera v. Springer CorporationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API